Friday 14 November 2014

Skill Bill



Now that we have a new Minister for Skills Development, this may be a good time to pause and consider the truth of our skills development efforts.  In a country where only about 2 percent of those entering the job market receive any formal training, and where the existing annual capacity to train is just over 3 million persons per annum, the government has a target of skilling 500 million young people by the year 2022.  This is an ambitious goal by any yardstick, both physically and financially, and one that we will need to meet in full measure if we are really to take advantage of the so-called “demographic dividend”.

The trouble though, is that this is not just a quantitative target; success here will depend partly on the numbers, but also on the quality of the skills imparted.  Not getting that piece right could lead us to a demographic disaster instead, with poorly trained or untrained and unemployable young people being let loose on the streets to cause mayhem and chaos.

Some months ago, I took a small vacation, spending a few days in my favourite city, Goa.  For a change this time, I booked myself into a brand new hotel, one that had started operations only a couple of months ago.  Swankily built, the hotel boasted all the mod cons – rain showers, fancy light fittings, a mini bar, 24x7 room service, blah, blah, blah.  From an infrastructural point of view, it is hard to think of anything that could have been added; clearly a great deal of thought and money had been invested in designing and setting up the property.

However, when it came to the staff and their orientation towards guest comfort, a great deal was left to be desired.  As in so many other service industries, the training of staff seemed to have stopped at the point where they had learnt how to smile and wish you ‘good morning’ or ‘good night’.  My request for a softer pillow than the one in my room left them completely flummoxed; this wasn’t a request in their script, and they didn’t know how to deal with it!

In recent years, there’s been a lot of discussion about skills training for young people, and the need to equip them with the ability to take on different types of jobs in the service industry.  Yet in none of these discussions have I once heard anyone talk about the concept of service, and how to help trainees understand it.  This lack of understanding impacts the manner in which customer-facing staff interact with the most important person for the business, the customer.  Since in most cases, this interaction takes place at the lowest level, it becomes the level at which an organisation’s public reputation is made or marred.

 Take for instance, the Indian Railways; notwithstanding the many seasoned and experienced managers in the organisation, its image in the public mind is determined almost solely by the rude (or corrupt) behaviour of the TTE on the train or the ticketing staff at the windows.  Similarly, anyone who has ever had to deal with a call centre at the other end of a phone for banking or mobile services will know exactly what I’m talking about.  Two minutes into the conversation, you’re wondering why you called them in the first place; unless you have a really simple request (that you could probably have executed yourself if you’d really tried), you will leave the conversation deeply frustrated and ready to kill.

Mind you, these are not untrained people; they have been trained quite extensively in what is considered appropriate, but never with the explicit end objective of serving the customer.  They are given a set routine – if A, then B; if B then C, and so on.  No allowances for the fact that the customer may want Z instead, and no scope for deviating from the script, even if they were inclined to be helpful.

Another example – I recently changed phones, and needed a smaller SIM card.  When I went to the service provider’s store, I was asked to provide proof of identity, residence, PAN card, etc, even though I’ve been their customer for more than ten years, and this data should be available on record.  After which, the new SIM card took more than 6 hours to be activated, during which time I had no service.  Contrast this with the process followed in US when I needed a phone during a short trip.  Not only did the retailer not need any paperwork, the phone was activated within a few minutes, well before I left the counter.

Which brings me back to where I began.  The trouble with our skilling programmes lies not in the training or lack of it; it lies in the fact that they are not focused on simplicity and service with the goal of satisfying the customer.  Why was it so easy to buy a working phone in the US as opposed to getting a replacement SIM card in India?  Largely because businesses there emphasise customer satisfaction, and will do whatever is needed to achieve it, unlike here, where we carry forward the old government mindset of “be grateful I’m giving you anything at all”.

Just as the newly launched Swachch Bharat Abhiyan seeks to change the way we look at cleanliness, we need to start stressing a sense of service in our education, skills and training programmes.  Skilling is not just about imparting technical abilities; it must also instil an awareness of customer requirements, and the need to satisfy them.  Not doing so will carry a much higher cost than the additional investment required for this purpose.  As the new Minister draws up plans to establish new training facilities and involve the private sector in delivery, wouldn’t it be great if he paid a little attention to this aspect too?

8 comments:

  1. Customer service has to be one of the most difficult areas to train. You might want to look into the Economist series’ book, Successful Strategy Execution. The primary example is that of the difference between the parleys at diplomatic levels during the end of the Iraq war, when the US was trying hard to convince the world that they were taking a civil approach, and a shoot-out on the ground erupted at the same time, inviting severe criticism. How does an organization manage that? When the C-suite is speaking one language, and the man on the frontline is following a different text?
    There are solutions, and most call for simple goals, organizational change and feedback. But all of these can be possible only if the culture permits easy adoption. As you point out, as in the case of the SIM card, there is a world of difference between the US and the Indian vendor – the latter is constrained by security issues, even when serving an existing customer; the former has a clear agenda, customer satisfaction, which is understood by all his superiors, the security forces included. If anything, they are the ones who have to have other options in place to track suspicious users, rather than he. And there is an entire legal machinery to protect his rights. Try putting this in place in a country with stringent hierarchies!
    One reason why the service industry in India, like the call centers, have several levels of supervision – the moment you have a question that needs a higher level of leeway, your call is transferred to the “supervisor”. The hotel experience is repetitive across cultures – I know of a gentleman who never got another blanket in his room, and nor was his AC set to a higher temperature in an upper end hotel in China. He did get all the smiles and politeness he wanted!
    There are, however, other issues that a ministry for skills will have to address. One of which, and the most important, is to identify and bring up to date the syllabi for skills training. Let me provide an example:
    For almost 2 years I could not convince my local, corner-shop electrician to revamp my electrical boards with MCBs (micro circuit breakers). Quite simply, he was just not up to speed with the technology. Simultaneously, an MNC was trying desperately to advertise his MCBs (through our ad agency), and at a loss as to why the market was not picking up! And this example can be repeated across categories – today, Whirlpool trains their own repairmen, and Volkswagen has set up their own automotive school, because they have no hope of finding qualified people.
    And this is where the government has to step in. To address what I call the copper-wire of every industry. In the service industry it has to be basics – how to set a tray, how to make beds, how to serve a meal (even take an order, or handle criticism) – all of these are learnable, without having to refer to a rulebook.
    Then there is the question of grading skills. And of anticipating new demands. And of working in tandem with new technologies, and new consumer needs.
    A ministry is well overdue. Let’s just hope they get their act together fast!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Couldn't agree more Shiv; however, as I pointed out in the post, its not just about the technical skills - it's also about changing attitudes, and that comes very slowly, if at all, unless there is a clear focus on making it happen! Things for the government - and the Ministry of Skills Development - to consider.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete